Dug a little more. Seems that ghc 7.4.* finalizes (ldap_unbind action) the ldap ptr before the references were actually dropped.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Magicloud Magiclouds <magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for the attachments. They are wireshark files. > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Magicloud Magiclouds > <magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> OK. Finally this problem totally prevents my project from working. >> By some guy's suggestion, I did a packet capturing, which really >> showed a difference. >> The rwdc file is for a ldap that at our IDC, which did not work with >> compiled binary. The rodc file is for a ldap that at local, which >> worked all the time. Each file contains two parts of records, at 3.* >> sec and 6/7.* sec. The 3.* part is for runhaskell way. The 6/7.* part >> is for compiled binary way. >> The big difference here is: the failed one sent unbindRequest before >> got bindResponse success. >> Just a clue, I have no idea what is going on.... >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Chris Dornan <ch...@chrisdornan.com> wrote: >>> No problem -- I have attached the executable too. >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Magicloud Magiclouds [mailto:magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: 01 June 2012 02:01 >>> To: Chris Dornan >>> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the difference between runhaskell and >>> compile? >>> >>> I see. >>> Although I am using a UTF-8 environment, but all string I was using were >>> ASCIIs. >>> If it is not too much trouble, may I have your LDAP compiled library files? >>> I think since the Main.o is identical, maybe the libraries are different. >>> >>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Chris Dornan <ch...@chrisdornan.com> wrote: >>>> I wouldn't pay too much attention to the fact that the hash tags are >>>> different -- they are very unlikely to be the same across two >>>> installations. (For example, my GHC installations are relocated under >>>> /usr/hs, immediately changing the contents of all of the .conf files >>>> and therefore the hashes.) >>>> >>>> The object files are more interesting, and they are identical! >>>> >>>> At the moment I can only explain what we are seeing by assuming that some >>>> change has affected the GHC 7.4.1 runtime system -- but only for compiled >>>> programs. >>>> >>>> Are you using non-ASCII characters in your LDAP passwords? I am thinking >>>> that maybe the compiled 7.4.1 could be using a different LOCALE from >>>> everything else, leading in some way to the passwords being encoded >>>> differently en route to the LDAP server. I don't know whether this could >>>> actually happen, but it is the kind of mechanism that seem most likely to >>>> be causing the problem. >>>> >>>> Did you try to running the variants that read address, account and >>>> passwords from standard input? Did it show the same perverse behaviour? >>>> >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Magicloud Magiclouds [mailto:magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com] >>>> Sent: 31 May 2012 02:47 >>>> To: Chris Dornan >>>> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the difference between runhaskell and >>>> compile? >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I have compared the files. The .o-es are exactly the same. The .hi-s are >>>> different. >>>> The interface hash, flag hash, and "import -/ LDAP-0.6.6:LDAP.Constants >>>> xxxxx(hash)" are different. >>>> I do not know why only this module (LDAP.Constants) has a different hash. >>>> I am not quite familiar with ghc compiling process. May I know your >>>> conclusion? >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Chris Dornan <ch...@chrisdornan.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Did you carry out a standard (optimised) build to get ghc-7.4.1? >>>>> >>>>> Are you going to try the justhub rpms or compare the object/header files >>>>> I sent. >>>>> >>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Magicloud Magiclouds [mailto:magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com] >>>>> Sent: 30 May 2012 04:07 >>>>> To: Chris Dornan >>>>> Cc: Haskell-Cafe >>>>> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the difference between runhaskell and >>>>> compile? >>>>> >>>>> A little information. >>>>> I did not notice the gcc/binutils versions. But in CentOS, the ghc >>>>> 7.2.2/7.4.1 were all compiled myself with all default configurations. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Chris Dornan <ch...@chrisdornan.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 29 May 2012 02:21, Magicloud Magiclouds >>>>>> <magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Interesting. I have this code tested in Debian unstable/stable, >>>>>>> CentOS 6.1, all 64 bit, with two different version of libldap2. >>>>>>> At first, Debian-s were installed with 7.4.1, CentOS with 7.2.2. >>>>>>> Only in CentOS the code connected after compiled. >>>>>>> Then I removed 7.4.1 from Debian stable and installed 7.2.2. The code >>>>>>> worked. >>>>>>> At last, I installed 7.4.1 in CentOS. The code did not work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you send the .hi/.o to me, so maybe I could find out the >>>>>>> different? Also the exact original source. >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Interesting indeed! I am guessing that you are using the GHC-7.4.1 >>>>>> bindist from haskell.org. >>>>>> >>>>>> I will try and find some time to marshal the source code and >>>>>> intermediate files (am on the road -- will need to collect it from >>>>>> base, make it generic etc.). >>>>>> >>>>>> You might also like to try the http://justhub.org ghc-7.4.1-hub on >>>>>> your CentOS-6.1 node. It is a separate build from the haskell.org >>>>>> bindist and comes with it's own in-board gcc (4.6.1) and binutils >>>>>> (2.21) used for the build. It should work for you. >>>>>> >>>>>> (You could also try ghc-7.4.2-RC1-hub.) >>>>>> >>>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> 竹密岂妨流水过 >>>>> 山高哪阻野云飞 >>>>> >>>>> And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> 竹密岂妨流水过 >>>> 山高哪阻野云飞 >>>> >>>> And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> 竹密岂妨流水过 >>> 山高哪阻野云飞 >>> >>> And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com. >> >> >> >> -- >> 竹密岂妨流水过 >> 山高哪阻野云飞 >> >> And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com. > > > > -- > 竹密岂妨流水过 > 山高哪阻野云飞 > > And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com. -- 竹密岂妨流水过 山高哪阻野云飞 And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe