On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> wrote: > I have to ask if your core language for Maple was larger than Maple?
I can think of several reasons why it would make sense, especially if the core language is much harder for a human to write for but much easier to optimize and/or generate machine code for. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix/linux, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
