On 25 Feb 2013, at 11:14, Oliver Charles wrote:

> Obvious question: How does this compare to cassava? Especially cassava's 
> Data.CSV.Incremental module? I specifically ask because you mention that it's 
> " It is lazier, faster, more space-efficient, and more flexible in its 
> treatment of errors, than any other extant Haskell CSV library on Hackage" 
> but there is no mention of cassava in the website.

Simple answer - I have never heard of cassava, and suspect it did not exist 
when I first did the benchmarking. I'd be happy to re-do my performance 
comparison, including cassava and any other recent-ish CSV libraries, if I can 
find them.

Regards,
    Malcolm
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to