Hi Tarik, Could you motivate the choice for these names? Thanks!
On 6 Aug 2013, at 08:14, Tarik ÖZKANLI <tozkanli2...@gmail.com> wrote: > next, carry, feed, roll > > > > On 6 August 2013 08:37, KC <kc1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought a pure value was being returned from the monad. :) > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Christian Sternagel <c.sterna...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Dear Jurriën. > > personally, I like "lift" (which is of course already occupied in Haskell), > since an arbitrary value is "lifted" into a monad. (The literature sometimes > uses "unit".) > > cheers > > chris > > > On 08/06/2013 02:14 PM, J. Stutterheim wrote: > Dear Cafe, > > > Suppose we now have the opportunity to change the name of the `return` > function in Monad, what would be a "better" name for it? (for some > definition of better) > > N.B. I am _not_ proposing that we actually change the name of `return`. I do > currently have the opportunity to pick names for common functions in a > non-Haskell related project, so I was wondering if there perhaps is a better > name for `return`. > > > - Jurriën > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > > > -- > -- > Regards, > KC > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
