On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:20:23PM -0400, jabolo...@google.com wrote: > Yeah, non-monadic is not the best term... The problem is that it's > always so hard to communicate when you want to say a total function > that is not in the context of the IO monad. There should be a simple, > short name for these functions, so we can easily talk about them.
Why, what would be different in your question for a non-total function or one in the context of the IO monad? Tom _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
