Jared Updike wrote:
> > "split" is... unconcatIntersperse.
>
> How about "separate"? ("split" or "splitBy" is better but
it is used
> all over the place in many libs)
>
> And for strings I definitely would use split :: [a] -> [a]
-> [[a]] a
> lot, just like Python's split function. And "words" works
great for
> breaking on multiple spaces, so I would avoid trying to
fill that
> need...
FWIW my home-grown versions of these things are called
fields and unfields.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
