Sorry, I used wrong e-mail address to post Haskell-Cafe.
So, I send this mail again.
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 06:03:46 +0900, Eric Y. Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 13:03:52 -0700, Daan Leijen wrote:
One potential challenge is to find a group of testers that are
willing to help compiling wxHaskell on different target systems:
Windows, MacOS X, and Unix/GTK variations.
I volunteer to help test on MacOS X
I voluteer to help test on Windows, too.
Why don't we make the switch to darcs while we're at it? Revision
control may be the least of our worries, but I think that darcs would
have been helpful specifically for our case (multiple
revisions of my Unicode patch, Shelarcy's patches for Windows stuff,
Mac Makefile stuff, the new DB-related issues).
Keeping track of patch-on-patch-on-patch has gottten to be tricky.
Having a truly patch-oriented system would
1. make it easier for outsiders to submit modifications
2. make us more resistant to the busy-ness of our project leaders
So, should we go ahead and do this?
I agree with you.
--
shelarcy <shelarcy capella.freemail.ne.jp>
http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
