Hello Michael, Thursday, September 14, 2006, 12:44:37 AM, you wrote:
> Or, what about using ListT to combine it with IO, eliminating the need for > two separate `do' blocks? according to my experience, in most cases we need two do blocks just because outer one contains more code after inner one finishes up -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe