Hello Michael,

Thursday, September 14, 2006, 12:44:37 AM, you wrote:

> Or, what about using ListT to combine it with IO, eliminating the need for
> two separate `do' blocks?

according to my experience, in most cases we need two do blocks just
because outer one contains more code after inner one finishes up


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to