Hi Bulat.

Ones who can handle and compile with GHC won't feel anything absurd working
with a console, CLI environment. They won't regard the lack of GUI as a
problem. But Kaveh does. It doesn't make sense that there would be anyone
who first develop in Hugs(deliberately not GHCi since it has no GUI) and
then compile it with GHC(which is far away from GUI, yet). People who will
(finally) compile their program in GHC would simply choose GHCi over Hugs.
Or else, is there any merit of Hugs that GHCi doesn't have?
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to