Andrew Coppin wrote:
> 
> 
> Haskell 98 does an excellent job of being extremely simple, yet almost 
> unbelievably powerful. Almost every day, I am blown away by how powerful 
> it is. I suppose it just defies belief that you could possibly need even 
> *more* power than is already in the language... 
> 

Sounds like the blub paradox ;-) 



> and also, as I've 
> mentioned, Haskell being simple is one of the most appealing things 
> about it. I dislike conceptual complexity. Still, it's only my personal 
> opinion, and the decision isn't actually up to me...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Memoization-tf3822500.html#a10832782
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to