>> >> They are just too big. The set of all sets can't exist, you know. >> > > That's news. >
It was news to Frege. > How come the set of all sets doesn't exist? > Russell's paradox - see e.g. Halmos: Naive Set Theory. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
