Hi > I agree. Unless... do some people subscribe to haskell@ (not > haskell-cafe@) and like the existing stuff that's sent there (not all > announcements... I'm not sure if I'd call e.g. Oleg's occasional > demonstrations "announcements" even)?
There are four things sent to the haskell list@ 1) Calls for papers 2) Annoucements 3) Oleg's stuff (which are really announcements of a library or technique) 4) Off topic stuff I'm initially only proposing to mop up category 4, which I am pretty sure the haskell@ people don't want to see. I did wonder whether this discussion should take place on the haskell@ list or the haskell-cafe@ one - the great ambiguity of the lists. > > (more, but can be done step by step in the future) > > Maybe, but I'm doubtful... (it might seem different to me in a year > though, i.e. some amount of time after a -->haskell-announce@ change has > been made.) This proposal has nothing to do with any future steps. They may happen, they may not, but I think this proposal is worthwhile on its own. Thanks Neil _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
