* zooko wrote: > This makes the choice of SHA-1 for the patch-id-generation function > wholly inappropriate. We already know that SHA-1 doesn't have > collision resistance, and there is reason to suspect that in the near > future it will turn out that it doesn't have second-pre-image > resistance either.
Calm down! The found collisions in SHA-1 require some very specific environment choices. I doubt darcs will allow those preconditions. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe