2008/4/1, Andrew Bagdanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > In short, I think the orginal question must be asked in context. For > some problems, types are just a natural way to start thinking about > them. For others dynamic typing, with _judicious_ use of macros to > model key aspects, is the most natural approach.
Do you have any example? I mean, you had to choose between Scheme and Ocaml, sometimes, right? Ocaml is not Haskell, but maybe the reasons which influenced your choices would have been similar if you knew Haskell instead of Ocaml. Cheers, Loup _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
