Trent W. Buck wrote:
I don't know why, but a lot of people I spoke to seemed to have that
impression, and I essentially had to wave changelogs under their face to
convince them that darcs was still being worked on *at all*. I had to
point out that it was a *release* announcement -- how could a dead
project have a new major version?
Perhaps a chirpy journalism major should be writing vapidly up-beat
announcement posts, denying even the possibility of problems :-P
Correct me if I'm wrong, but... I was under the impression that Darcs is
a revision control system. It controls revisions.
Well Darcs already does that. So... what's to develop? It's not like
it's slow or buggy. I can't actually think of any features it doesn't
have that I want. So... what now?
In case that sounds really negative and critical, let me phrase it
another way: Given that Darcs is more or less perfect now, what's to add?
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
