On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 17:01 -0500, Galchin, Vasili wrote: > how do I unbork it? Are darcs version of package same as hackage > version of packages teh same contents?
To be honest I'd not bother. You already have the version of the process package that came with ghc and there are no new releases that you need. That's why nobody else noticed the problem, because nobody needs to install this package, because it comes with ghc. If you really want to re-install it anyway then you could use the darcs version that goes with the ghc-6.8.x branch: http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.8/packages/process Obviously in principle the version on hackage should have worked. You'll be glad to know that hackage now checks that packages that use build-type Configure do indeed actually have a ./configure file, so this particular error cannot be repeated. Duncan > Regards, Vasili > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Duncan Coutts > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 00:36 -0500, Galchin, Vasili wrote: > > Hi Duncan, > > > > In reality there is a complaint about no "configure" > file. In any > > case, you really mean "autoconf" and not "autoreconf" yes? > If I should > > run "autoconf", there is no configure.ac or configure.in > file under > > the process directory! ?? > > > Ah, you're using process-1.0.0.0 from hackage. It does indeed > appear to > be borked because it specifies build-type: Configure and yet > contains > no ./configure script. > > Sorry, I assumed that you were missing ./configure because you > were > using the darcs version. > > Duncan > > > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
