To be honest I'd not bother. You already have the version of the process > package that came with ghc and there are no new releases that you need. > That's why nobody else noticed the problem, because nobody needs to > install this package, because it comes with ghc. >
problem here Duncan .. when I run "cabal install haskelldb" e.g. "process" is rightly seen as a dependency BUT unrightly as not currently installed .... ??? > > If you really want to re-install it anyway then you could use the darcs > version that goes with the ghc-6.8.x branch: > > http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.8/packages/process > > Obviously in principle the version on hackage should have worked. You'll > be glad to know that hackage now checks that packages that use > build-type Configure do indeed actually have a ./configure file, so this > particular error cannot be repeated. > > Duncan > > > Regards, Vasili > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Duncan Coutts > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 00:36 -0500, Galchin, Vasili wrote: > > > Hi Duncan, > > > > > > In reality there is a complaint about no "configure" > > file. In any > > > case, you really mean "autoconf" and not "autoreconf" yes? > > If I should > > > run "autoconf", there is no configure.ac or configure.in > > file under > > > the process directory! ?? > > > > > > Ah, you're using process-1.0.0.0 from hackage. It does indeed > > appear to > > be borked because it specifies build-type: Configure and yet > > contains > > no ./configure script. > > > > Sorry, I assumed that you were missing ./configure because you > > were > > using the darcs version. > > > > Duncan > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe