Jeremy Apthorp wrote:
2008/9/1 Andrew Coppin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Trouble is, as soon as you allow let-bindings, some clever person is going
to start writing recursive ones. And actually, that's a useful thing to be
able to do, but it makes figuring out the technical details... rather
nontrivial. (Seriously, I had no idea I was going to get into this much
trouble!)
I'm confused -- why is this different to having recursive top-level bindings?
It isn't different - and if my interpretter ever has top-level bindings,
it'll introduce all the same problems. :-S
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
