My linux distribution does not have a ghc. It is customed by my company. So I have to install it from souce. And the reason that some situation I did not descript clearly is that they are long time ago, I cannot remember the details....

John Van Enk wrote:
Could you, perhaps, outline a little more of what you're trying to do? I'm having a hard time seeing what exactly you're doing, and why you can't use the package provided by your distribution.

We'd love to help you, but you're not being very clear with what your problem is.

/jve


On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Magicloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Thank you for your reply.
    So the main information I got is that cabal is not safe. And my
    problems are all related to cabal, I think, dependency, ABI
    version....
    I hope everything could be better soon. At least, tools should not
    block the way of producing.


    Thomas Schilling wrote:

        2008/10/14 Magicloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
            Sorry, let me say it this way:
            1. Ghc cannot be bootstrap-installed. And the ghc-6.8.3
            binary from official
            website also cannot run in my box, some kind of overflow
            error. So I have to
            look for help, a few hours later, I found 6.4.2 (I am not
            sure) which runs
            well in my box, and install ghc-6.8.3 indirectly.

        Hm, the only issue with binary installers I had were old
        versions of
        some libraries which could be resolved by adding a few
        symlinks.  What
        system are you on?

            2. After `cabal update && cabal upgrade`, ghc-6.8.3 cannot
            be built.

        Which version of cabal-install ( cabal --version ) are you using?
        Note that 'cabal upgrade' is not guaranteed to work since
        libraries on
        hackage don't always specify their dependencies correctly and
        older
        versions of cabal-install might have some issues.  There's an
        ongoing
        initiative to have a set of more controlled packages, the Haskell
        Platform.  It should soon has its first release.

        That said, you shouldn't need to upgrade anything if you want
        to build
        ghc 6.8.3 with 6.4.2. <http://6.4.2.>  Also, what version of
        ghc does you distribution
        provide?

            Lib
            Network.URI cannot be compiled because:
            Network/CGI/Protocol.hs:41:0:
             Failed to load interface for `Network.URI':
              Perhaps you haven't installed the profiling libraries
            for package
            network-2.2.0.0?
              Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
            I remove this SUBDIRS from the Makefile, luckly, it works.
            A few more hours
            lost in my life.
            3. When I `ghc -v`, there are lots of "hiding package xxx
            to avoid conflict
            with later version yyy", do I have a way to remove these
            hiding packages?
            And "package xx will be ignored due to missing or
            recursive dependencies:
            yy", what does this mean? If it is ignored, my program
            using it compiled and
            run well. If the dependencies are not right, how can I fix
            it? I installed
            this by cabal. It reports nothing wrong and cannot check
            if all packages
            dependencies are OK.
            4. When `cabal upgrade`, I do not think it knows what it
            is doing. There
            were many times that I cannot upgrade because I should
            manually reinstall
            some packages to make it work (Some guy say that this is
            because ghc cannot
            know the difference between two lib files with the same
            name). And, cabal
            does not upgrade all packages, I do not know why.

        The issue is binary compatibility.  At the moment, GHC cannot make
        sure that a library compiled with an older GHC can work with a
        newer
        GHC.  GHC does many cross-module optimisations, and its
        runtime system
        changes occasionally, so it is very pessimistic in that
        regard.  This
        becomes an issue for packages that GHC has been build with itself
        (like base, process, array), since these cannot be upgraded
        without
        recompiling GHC (hence requiring recompiling every other package).
        Older versions of cabal-install could not deal with this
        correctly.
        So in short, "cabal upgrade" (without arguments) is probably
        not very
        safe, atm.

        There are ongoing efforts to provide more ABI compatibility
        guarantees, but that requires solving of some difficult issues, so
        we're not there yet.

        There are certainly some things that could be improved.  For
        example
        GHC 6.10 won't let you unregister a package that other
        packages depend
        on and it keeps checksums of the ABI which may be used by future
        versions of Cabal/cabal-install.

            5. Sometimes when I upgrade some libraries, ghc failed to
            compile, because
            ld failed to find the new libraries. (Which proves that
            ghc cannot deal with
            binary files right). I need to recompile this, and
            recompile that, MAYBE it
            would be resolved.

        Without further details I can just guess, but I think this is
        related
        to the problems with binary compatibility above.

            Everyday, I spend a few hours on compiling. Does it really
            need to be so
            terrible? With erlang or ruby, I never spend more time
            debugging as
            haskell's feature says but less time on how to run my code.

        Many projects can just be loaded via ghci which is a lot
        faster.  Just
        cd to the toplevel source directory, type :l ModuleName.  Then
        edit
        the source code, and type :r to reload the current module.

        With many of these smaller issues you can often find quick help on
        Haskell's IRC channel #haskell or #ghc if you have problems
        specific
        to GHC (although asking at #haskell will often give you an
        answer more
        quickly, so ask there first anyway)

        HTH,

         Thomas


            Thomas Schilling wrote:
                It would be helpful if you could describe exactly what
                you did so we
                can work on improving the issue in the long term (and
                help you fix it
                in the short term).

                2008/10/14 Magicloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:

                    1. I cannot install ghc-6.8.3 in my box until I
                    found the old runable
                    binary.
                    2. After I installed cabal, and upgraded,
                    ghc-6.8.3 cannot rebuild
                    itself.
                    Because its libraries are conflict with the ones
                    upgraded by cabal.
                    3. Sometimes, ghc just ignore some libs, because
                    it does not meet its
                    dependencies. Well, ghc does not even tell me. It
                    knows what I want?
                    4. I use cabal, thinking it would make
                    dependencies installation easier
                    for
                    me. Well it does not, once an error happened,
                    nothing would work since. I
                    cannot even remove the broken lib.
                    5. No more needed. The above ones, which are
                    important enough to drive me
                    crazy.
                    _______________________________________________
                    Haskell-Cafe mailing list
                    Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
                    <mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org>
                    http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe




    _______________________________________________
    Haskell-Cafe mailing list
    Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org <mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org>
    http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe



_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to