Matti Niemenmaa schrieb: > Anyway, hake looks interesting but it's not a replacement for Coadjute; > and neither is Coadjute for hake. To be completely honest I'm not sure > what use case hake is meant to solve: how does it improve over plain make?
It seems to be programmable, and thus may better cope with LaTeX, where the simple 'make' philosophy fails. 'latex' must be called repeatedly, interleaved with 'bibtex' and 'mkindex'. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
