Malcolm Wallace wrote: > As for Reply-to: munging - I agree that _changing_ an existing header > would be bad, but would be very happy if mailing lists were to > _introduce_ one on messages where none already existed.
That would IMO be the worst of both worlds, as people might use Reply-To for reasons entirely unconnected with the mailing list. So you'd end up with a confusing situation where the default target of replies varied depending on some completely irrelevant factor. Ganesh ============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html ============================================================================== _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
