* Corey O'Connor <coreyocon...@gmail.com> [2009-02-10 10:21:54-0800]
> I released a new version of data-spacepart that resolved some of the
> issues with the previous release. One issue I had was the previous
> release used the version numbering scheme I use at work:
> [date].[release] Which does not appear to work as well as the
> traditional X.Y.Z release numbering scheme with Cabal. As part of the
> new release I changed the version numbering scheme. An *obviously* bad
> idea if I thought it through. Any [date].[release] style version
> number is greater than a X.Y.Z version number until X gets rather
> large.
>
> So what to do? Continue using the [date].[release] version numbering
> scheme? Or is there a way to coax HackageDB to ignore the old release?
>From haxr changelog:
Sun Feb 11 11:43:15 EET 2007 bj...@bringert.net
* Changed haxr version number to 3000.0.0 to avoid ordering problems
with old date-based version numbers.
--
Roman I. Cheplyaka :: http://ro-che.info/
"Don't let school get in the way of your education." - Mark Twain
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
