Corey O'Connor wrote:
I released a new version of data-spacepart that resolved some of the
issues with the previous release. One issue I had was the previous
release used the version numbering scheme I use at work:
[date].[release] Which does not appear to work as well as the
traditional X.Y.Z release numbering scheme with Cabal. As part of the
new release I changed the version numbering scheme. An *obviously* bad
idea if I thought it through. Any [date].[release] style version
number is greater than a X.Y.Z version number until X gets rather
large.
So what to do? Continue using the [date].[release] version numbering
scheme? Or is there a way to coax HackageDB to ignore the old release?
Use a (slightly) different package name?
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
