Bulat Ziganshin <bulat.zigans...@gmail.com> wrote:
> so - why YOU think that ghc
> generates fast code and this example is something unusual?
>
I think ghc has decent performance, and that there's room for
improvement. I don't care whether you compare it to gcc,
malbolge, or hand-written assembly, what matters isn't whether
something is unusual, it is that
look below
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
if there's any way to have faster code than you get with ghc, right
now, it's worth a bug report, even if it's going to be tagged as
Milestone: ghc 120.10. Non-tracked issues are non-issues.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
look above
Disk space is cheap, nowadays, and we can't have Simon's backlog run
empty. Anything could happen.
BTW: If you think I was being sarcastic in my last post, you are
mistaken. The message is much simpler.
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting,
performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
