On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:52:27PM +0100, Thomas Davie wrote: > > On 20 Feb 2009, at 23:44, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: > >> Hello John, >> >> Saturday, February 21, 2009, 1:33:12 AM, you wrote: >> >>> Don't forget jhc: >> >> i was pretty sure that jhc will be as fast as gcc :) unfortunately, >> jhc isn't our production compiler > > Why not? There's nothing stopping you from choosing any Haskell > compiler you like. If jhc gives you the performance you need – use it.
Heh. He probably meant something more like "jhc is not a production compiler" which is true for a lot of projects. For projects of substantial size or that require many extensions, jhc falls somewhat short. It is getting better though. Of course, help is always appreciated. :) John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe