2009/2/28 Lennart Augustsson <lenn...@augustsson.net>: > If you were writing your own Binary class you could simply make Show > and Read superclasses of Binary and it would be trivial to have > default implementations based on Show and Read. > That's my fallback approach, yes, but I don't really want to make Binary a subclass of Show,Read. I'd like to be able to define this for classes in packages I *don't* control, and without *requiring* the fallback to work..
As you say, it isn't exactly a critical issue. I was just wondering if it was possible, really. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
