* in the Appendix on notation, he defines composition of functions the "wrong way around" (i.e., the Haskell way, (f.g)(x) = f(g(x)).
Just to make sure I understand correctly: are you claiming that Haskell definition of composition is wrong?
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
