Wow. This is really a bikeshed discussion. My post contained praise for the book, a critique of one of its design decisions (intermediate language not explicitely typed), and a syntactical remark. Guess what the discussion is about. (This is also known as http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Wadlers_Law)
If you're advocating (f.g) = \ x -> f(g(x)), then: 1. Define composition of relations. 2. Is a function a special case of a relation? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Recommending-%22Design-concepts-in-programming-languages%22-tp23301907p23446161.html Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
