Am Dienstag 30 Juni 2009 20:56:10 schrieb David Leimbach: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Brent Yorgey <byor...@seas.upenn.edu>wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:45:45AM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > > > I've thought for a while that it would be very nice indeed if the > > > Monoid class had a more concise operator for infix appending than "a > > > `mappend` > > > > b". > > > > > I wonder if other people are of a similar opinion, and if so, whether > > > > this > > > > > is worth submitting a libraries@ proposal over. > > > > +1. > > > > IIRC Jules Bean has proposed using (+>) for this purpose, which I > > like. It has the advantages of (a) not clashing with any other > > (common) operators, (b) making more obvious the fact that mappend is > > not necessarily commutative, and (c) providing the obvious (<+) for > > 'flip mappend' which is sometimes useful. > > I actually think this proposal is pretty excellent.
I actually think your assessment of the proposal is correct. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe