On 30 Jun 2009, at 22:19, Daniel Fischer wrote:
Am Dienstag 30 Juni 2009 20:56:10 schrieb David Leimbach:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Brent Yorgey <byor...@seas.upenn.edu
>wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:45:45AM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
I've thought for a while that it would be very nice indeed if the
Monoid class had a more concise operator for infix appending than
"a
`mappend`
b".
I wonder if other people are of a similar opinion, and if so,
whether
this
is worth submitting a libraries@ proposal over.
+1.
IIRC Jules Bean has proposed using (+>) for this purpose, which I
like. It has the advantages of (a) not clashing with any other
(common) operators, (b) making more obvious the fact that mappend is
not necessarily commutative, and (c) providing the obvious (<+) for
'flip mappend' which is sometimes useful.
I actually think this proposal is pretty excellent.
I actually think your assessment of the proposal is correct.
I excellently think your proposal is a correct assessment.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
