On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Jules Bean <ju...@jellybean.co.uk> wrote:
> Duncan Coutts wrote: > >> I agree, if we can't use ++ then <> is the next best thing. As John says >> it's already a monoid operator for Data.Sequence and Text.PrettyPrint. >> >> > I agree, if we can't use +> and <+ then <> is the next best thing. > > ;) > > Jules I like this thinking as well. I kind of wish Haskell didn't overload operators to begin with but oh well :-) Just because the compiler can figure out what I mean because it has a great type system, I might not be able to figure out what I mean a year from now if I see ++ everywhere. In some sense, I prefer misleading function names to overly overloaded operators. Dave > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
