On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan <b...@serpentine.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Duncan Coutts <duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.uk > > wrote: > >> >> I agree, if we can't use ++ then <> is the next best thing. > > > Okay, here's a tentative plan that will help to figure out the answer. I'll > build a fiddled base package that rewires the Monoid class to have (++) be > the binary operator, and mappend as a synonym for it. I'll import the Monoid > (++) into the Prelude. I'll see how much breaks. If that much builds > smoothly, I'll see how much of the rest of Hackage builds, both with and > without this custom base package. I'll follow up here with the results, > along with a suggestion of how acceptable I think the observed level of > breakage is. > > Seem reasonable? > It's more reasonable than sitting around waxing philosophical on the notation I suppose :-) > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
