Thanks everyone, Hmm...I hadn't thought about it that way, but w/r/t Haskell you're absolutely right.
People have said that Haskell is good to learn because it makes one think differently about programming, and they're right. Michael --- On Wed, 10/21/09, Neal Alexander <relapse....@gmx.com> wrote: From: Neal Alexander <relapse....@gmx.com> Subject: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Simple but interesting (for me) problem To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 2:34 PM michael rice wrote: > There's a thread on the plt-scheme list about creating a function of NO > arguments named NEXT that just returns the number of times it's been called, > a piece of cake in Scheme, but how would one do this in Haskell? Would the > best approach be to use a State monad? > > Michael > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe I think its more in the spirit of things things to have a function that produces an infinite list of values. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
