And just because this has not been explicitly stated: it's not just for aesthetic reasons that you couldn't do this with a pure function, but because it violates the semantics and gets you the wrong result. So for example, if you modified Tim's code to be

import Data.IORef
import System.IO.Unsafe

mkNext :: (Num a) => IO a
mkNext = do
  ref <- newIORef 0
  return . unsafePerformIO $
         do
           modifyIORef ref (+1)
           readIORef ref

main :: IO ()
main = do
  foo <- mkNext
  print foo
  print foo
  print foo


Then the output that you will see (with GHC at least) is

1
1
1

because the compiler assumes that it only needs to evaluate foo once, after which it can cache the result due to assumed referential transparency.

- Greg



On Oct 21, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Tim Wawrzynczak wrote:

True...here we go then:

import Data.IORef
import System.IO.Unsafe

mkNext :: (Num a) => IO (IO a)
mkNext = do
  ref <- newIORef 0
  return (do modifyIORef ref (+1)
             readIORef ref)

next :: IO ()
next = do
  foo <- mkNext
  a <- sequence [foo,foo,foo]
  putStrLn $ show a


running next will print [1,2,3] which is the result of calling 'foo' 3 times.

But technically then, mkNext is just an IO action which returns an IO action ;) and not a function which will return the next value each time it is called,
hence the need to extract the value from mkNext, then use it...

Cheers,
Tim


On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:30 PM, minh thu <not...@gmail.com> wrote:
2009/10/21 Tim Wawrzynczak <inforichl...@gmail.com>
>
> Here's an example in the IO monad:
>
> import Data.IORef
> import System.IO.Unsafe
>
> counter = unsafePerformIO $ newIORef 0
>
> next = do
>   modifyIORef counter (+1)
>   readIORef counter
>
> Naturally, this uses unsafePerformIO, which as you know, is not kosher...

But you don't close around the Ref like in your schemy example.

mkNext = do
 ref <- newIORef 0
 return (do modifyIORef ref succ
            readIORef ref)

mimic your other code better.

Cheers,
Thu

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to