Hello Rafal, Thursday, November 12, 2009, 3:10:54 PM, you wrote:
>> it's impossible to interpret haskell - how can you do type inference? >> hugs, like ghci, is bytecode interpreter. the difference is their >> implementation languages - haskell vs C > We use Standard ML for the Isabelle/HOL theorem prover, and it's > interpreted, even has an interactive toplevel. It uses type inference, > does it not? In fact, in a not-very-serious discussion at some point of > what one could replace javascript with for a browser-embedded language, > SML came up. ghc also has interactive toplevel. it compiles haskell down to bytecode, though. type inference is a part of compilation process, afaik, ocaml also generates bytecode. don't know about isabelle -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
