On Nov 12, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Evan Laforge wrote:
Recently the "go" language was announced at golang.org.
It looks a lot like Limbo; does it have Limbo's dynamic loading?
According to Rob Pike, the main reason for 6g's speed
It's clear that 6g doesn't do as much optimisation as gccgo. It probably doesn't do as much optimisation as GHC. And it certainly doesn't have any kind of generics, let along type-level programming. I'd say the semantic distance between 'go' and x86 is quite a bit less than that between Haskell and x86. No laziness! _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
