wren ng thornton wrote: > concat1 :: T a b -> (b -> T a b) -> T a b
This could just as easily be concat :: T a b -> (b -> T a c) -> T a c right? It's a little weird to call this concatenation, but I bet it could come in handy. -- Jason McCarty <jmcca...@sent.com> _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
