Jason McCarty wrote:
wren ng thornton wrote:concat1 :: T a b -> (b -> T a b) -> T a bThis could just as easily be concat :: T a b -> (b -> T a c) -> T a c right? It's a little weird to call this concatenation, but I bet it could come in handy.
Er right, that's what I meant. (Again the posting without enough coffee to pave over the cognitive potholes </chagrin>)
-- Live well, ~wren _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
