On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:09 PM, John MacFarlane <j...@berkeley.edu> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Antoine Latter <aslat...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I finally had some time to test it. After running it multiple times >> (of course, it would be nice to use criterion here), I'm getting >> numbers in this neighborhood: >> > > I used criterion to compare pandoc compiled with parsec2 to > pandoc compiled with your version of parsec3. (The benchmark > is converting testsuite.txt from markdown to HTML.) The difference was > minor:
Very nice, I was interested in parsec 3 but scared off by the reports of slowness, as I'm sure many others were. Is there any document out there describing the differences between 2 and 3? I gathered 3 allows more flexibility wrt the input, so you can more easily use ByteString or Text, but it would be nice to have a doc saying what the new features are and why we should be interested in upgrading. The old parsec docs were out of date even for parsec 2, and looks like they haven't been updated. The new ones look like they use haddock which is great, that was a gripe I had about the old doc. However, the haddock docs are less friendly than the old doc. So my suggestion is to paste the old introduction (with Daan permission, of course) or something similar into the Text.Parsec description field, along with links to more detailed descriptions and tutorial in the style of v2 on haskell.org along with a 2 vs. 3 doc, even if they're sketchy and brief. Or if it's ok I could just send some darcs patches :) _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
