> So my biggest reservation is if I can even call my branch the same > parser as Parsec.
Maybe we could go the way regexes: say "parsec" is an API, and allow multiple backends with different characteristics as long as they basically implement that API. In practice, a lot of parser combinator libraries have something close to the parsec API already. They don't have to be completely compatible, i.e. you might have a 'parse' function take different arguments, but it would be practical to have a standard set of core combinators. Or come up with a new name for the "API" or call in parseclike or something :) _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
