On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan <b...@serpentine.com>wrote:
> I'm thinking of switching the statistics library over to using vector. > uvector is pretty bit-rotted in comparison to vector at this point, and it's > really seeing no development, while vector is The Shiny Future. Roman, would > you call the vector library good enough to use in production at the moment? > I like the vector API much better than the uvector one. * no "U" suffixes on functions (go namespaces!) and * no cryptic names (what's an UAE?). Cheers, Johan
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
