On 12/02/2010, at 12:40, Don Stewart wrote: > rl: >> On 11/02/2010, at 05:03, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: >> >>> I'm thinking of switching the statistics library over to using vector. >>> uvector is pretty bit-rotted in comparison to vector at this point, and >>> it's really seeing no development, while vector is The Shiny Future. Roman, >>> would you call the vector library good enough to use in production at the >>> moment? >> >> Yes, with the caveat that I haven't really used it in production code >> (I have tested and benchmarked it, though). BTW, I'll release version >> 0.5 as soon as get a code.haskell.org account and move the repo there. >> > > That's the main problem. I think we could move to vector as a whole, if > the suite of testing/ performance/documentation stuff from uvector was ported.
Hmm, I'm not sure what you mean here. Mostly thanks to Max Bolingbroke's efforts, vector has a fairly extensive testsuite. I benchmark it a lot (with NoSlow) and haven't found any significant performance problems in a while. As to documentation, there are comments for most of the functions :-) Roman _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
