On 12/02/2010, at 12:39, Don Stewart wrote: > bos: >> I'm thinking of switching the statistics library over to using vector. >> uvector >> is pretty bit-rotted in comparison to vector at this point, and it's really >> seeing no development, while vector is The Shiny Future. Roman, would you >> call >> the vector library good enough to use in production at the moment? > > uvector's not seeing much development, but at least in the last round of > benchmarks it was still consistently faster -- since it's been > micro-optimized.
FWIW, the development version of vector is usually faster the both uvector and dph-prim-seq, at least for the development version of NoSlow. Roman _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
