It is ironic, but after reading your paper - "Experience Report: Haskell in the Real World", I doubt I'll use Haskell for a performance critical systems. Laziness (and understanding it) is one factor, but there is also GC, which is a real hassle, especially in embedded/mobile systems for a near real-time applications. In short, when milliseconds matter I'd prefer to stick with GC-less language and with native binaries.
Regards, Zura Curt Sampson-2 wrote: > > (Oh, and the trading system is running in production and making money > these days. There's no question in my mind that the project was a > success, and I'd do it in GHC again. Thanks to the Simons and many > others for the fantastic job they've done with that.) > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/What-is-Haskell-unsuitable-for--tp28897715p29099864.html Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe