On 07/20/2010 11:45 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
I think a simple statement along the lines of the GNU Classpath linking
exception would go very far[1]. I only mention that one since it's
quoted verbatim on the Wikipedia site.

Michael

[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL_linking_exception#The_classpath_exception

That one pertains to GPL, not LGPL. The issues with each are different. HaXml, however, has this:

As a relaxation of clause 6 of the LGPL, the copyright holders of this
library give permission to use, copy, link, modify, and distribute,
binary-only object-code versions of an executable linked with the
original unmodified Library, without requiring the supply of any
mechanism to modify or replace the Library and relink (clauses 6a,
6b, 6c, 6d, 6e), provided that all the other terms of clause 6 are
complied with.

I need to read the LGPL and analyze it closer, but my first analysis suggests that this would work fine for me and others.

wxHaskell uses:

  EXCEPTION NOTICE

  1. As a special exception, the copyright holders of this library give
  permission for additional uses of the text contained in this release of
  the library as licenced under the wxWindows Library Licence, applying
  either version 3 of the Licence, or (at your option) any later version of
  the Licence as published by the copyright holders of version 3 of the
  Licence document.

  2. The exception is that you may use, copy, link, modify and distribute
  under the user's own terms, binary object code versions of works based
  on the Library.

  3. If you copy code from files distributed under the terms of the GNU
  General Public Licence or the GNU Library General Public Licence into a
  copy of this library, as this licence permits, the exception does not
apply to the code that you add in this way. To avoid misleading anyone as
  to the status of such modified files, you must delete this exception
  notice from such code and/or adjust the licensing conditions notice
  accordingly.

  4. If you write modifications of your own for this library, it is your
  choice whether to permit this exception to apply to your modifications.
  If you do not wish that, you must delete the exception notice from such
  code and/or adjust the licensing conditions notice accordingly.

I'll also want to evaluate LGPL v3, which I have been meaning to move to anyhow.

-- John
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to