2010/7/21 Ketil Malde <ke...@malde.org>: > John Goerzen <jgoer...@complete.org> writes: > >> I need to read the LGPL and analyze it closer, but my first analysis >> suggests that this would work fine for me and others. > > I'm using the LGPL for library code, and GPL for applications. Although > a lot of noise is generated from the linking issues, the most imporant > point to me is that LGPL allows you to use the library in other open > source (but non-GPL-compliant) applications. > > Binary/commercial/proprietary software - well, I'll worry about it the > day it happens. So far, nobody ever asked for a BSD license - but I'd > be happy about an exception (even with modifications to the library, as > long as those modifications were available).
For a LGPL library, why do you make the distinction between open source and proprietary applications? They can all link to a LGPL library. Cheers, Thu _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
