On 3 October 2010 12:10, Michael Snoyman <mich...@snoyman.com> wrote: > I would actually do the opposite: we can put the libraries/frameworks > that we are sure *are* active into the Active section and put > everything else into Inactive. I have a feeling we'll be pretty close > on the mark with our guesses; a quick look at the last upload date on > Hackage should be sufficient. People are *much* more likely to move > stuff from Inactive to Active than the other way around. > > We can also send out an email to the cafe/web-devel with a list of > packages we plan to mark as inactive and see if anyone objects. If no > one is willing to stand up for a package, odds are it's dead.
That sounds like a good approach. Anyway, it's not the end of the world if a package gets put in inactive. Ones I know are definitely active are: Happstack Haskell on a Horse loli Salvia Snap Yesod Turbinado -- is this still active? Alson Kemp basically ditched Haskell, so... Yesod The others... I don't know. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe