On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:09:00 +0200, Vo Minh Thu <not...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/10/11 Roman Cheplyaka <r...@ro-che.info>: >> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:54:12 +0100, Magnus Therning <mag...@therning.org> >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 08:37, Michael Snoyman <mich...@snoyman.com> >> wrote: >>> [...] >>>> Also, now 10 random profiles will be displayed on the homepage. Only >>>> "verified users" will be displayed here. I'm also considering adding a >>>> new status as well: real picture, so that only people with real images >>>> (not cartoons, not identicons) can show up on the homepage. I think >>>> this might give a more professional feel. Thoughts? >>> >>> I'd be weary of making that a requirement, there are good reasons for >>> not putting your picture on the web, just like there are good reasons >>> to not use your real name :-) >> >> ... just like there are good reasons not to publish yourself in a public >> catalogue (such as haskellers.com) at all. >> >> I have nothing against anonymity. I voted against requirement of real >> names >> on hackage. >> >> But in this particular case, the whole point to be in the listing is to >> present yourself. So I find the above proposal very reasonable. > > Hi, > > In the belgian law, an employer can (of course) request a faithful > resume, but cannot request the resume to contain a picture of you. > This is a clear example where you wish to advertise yourself, but not > necessarily with a picture. Anyway, I don't think it is difficult to > imagine situations where one doesn't wish to show a picture of his/her > face.
Agree. But then there should be no picture at all for a given person. As Michael said -- no cartoons, no identicons. -- Roman I. Cheplyaka :: http://ro-che.info/ "Don't let school get in the way of your education." - Mark Twain _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe