To be fair to the Haddock designer, red links are common these days. Here's two examples (among many):
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ http://www.slate.com/ In the second case the site uses blue, black *and* red links to distinguish different types of content. They are all in bold and underline when hovered over so are not hard to distinguish from ordinary text. Kevin. On Oct 28, 9:52 am, Michael Snoyman <mich...@snoyman.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Christopher Done > > > > <chrisd...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On 28 October 2010 03:41, Victor Oliveira <rhapso...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Cafe, > > >> I really liked the new colors of haskell theme, but... > > >> Is really red a good color for links? At least for me, red links looks > >> like broken or already visited ones. > > >> And the worst is hackage docs. It is really eye tiring to read. > > >> It's just a thought. Maybe it just with me. > > >> What about you? > > > This was my initial impression. Red means broken. Links are blue. I > > thought maybe no one would be bothered by it, but I see one person at > > least. > > I'm not incredibly bothered by it, but I did find it a bit strange. > > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > haskell-c...@haskell.orghttp://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe