On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan <b...@serpentine.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bas van Dijk <v.dijk....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Then we can use the TimeoutKey as our Unique (Note that a TimeoutKey >> is actually a newtype for a Unique): > > That should be fine. It's not a public API, so changing it like that > shouldn't be an issue.
I think this sounds like a good option. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
